Returns are a fact of life when it comes to e-commerce: our quantitative study of users’ return habits finds that 72% of users had made at least one return of an online purchase over the past year.
Furthermore our qualitative testing finds that, for many users, the return process can be a source of anxiety, as it may be an unfamiliar process and there are many factors that can impact whether and when users will receive their refund (e.g., a site’s specific return policy, whether return labels are included in the product shipment, if there’s an online return interface, etc.).
During our large-scale Self-Service E-Commerce usability testing, it became clear that there are many ways sites can reduce users’ anxiety when it comes to the return process, and by doing so make it more likely that a user will develop a positive perception of the site on the whole.
Testing also revealed that an advantage omni-channel sites often have when it comes to e-commerce is allowing users to drop off returns in store (or at a dropoff point), rather than requiring users return products by mail. In-store returns can for some users be easier, as they don’t have to worry about return packing, return shipping costs, and the time it takes to receive a refund or exchange a product.
However, users must be able to find the in-store return option to benefit from it. An in-store return option that goes unnoticed by users can be as bad as not having the option available at all — representing a missed opportunity for sites.
In this article, we’ll discuss the test findings from our Accounts & Self-Service E-Commerce usability study related to in-store returns. In particular, we’ll discuss:
In testing, 20% of users indicated a preference for returning an item directly to the store.
For many users the reasons why they would choose to return to a brick-and-mortar store boil down to 1) Cost, 2) Convenience, 3) Faster refunds, and 4) Easier exchanges.
Many users are very concerned with all of the costs associated with online shopping, including the cost to return products when they don’t work out.
Having the option to return a product to a store, for free, is therefore for many users a prime benefit of shopping at a site that has in-store returns.
Many users during testing mentioned how it would be easier to return a product to a store, since they knew (or suspected) there was one close to where they lived or worked.
As one user stated during testing, “I appreciated that I could return it in store…it was more convenient to go talk to the person at the desk, ask about the return policy”.
Another user noted, “You probably gotta get a box [to mail the return], and it gives you an address to send it to, then you gotta wait, and make sure.… And you’re always kinda checking…I’d rather go back to the store with an item and have them throw the refund on my credit card”.
Mailing a product back to a store can be quite a hassle, and can include completing the return process online, printing a shipping label, finding appropriate packaging, packing the product securely, and finally taking the package to be shipped.
In short, for users who live near the brick-and-mortar store they want to return an item to, it’s often just easier to go to the physical store to return the product (or at least perceived to be easier).
3) Faster Refunds
The end goal that most users have in mind when trying to complete a return is to get a refund for their purchase.
Returning a product to the brick-and-mortar store eliminates shipping time, often resulting in faster refunds for users. Users can also ask sales associates when they can expect to receive their refund when returning a product in store, helping to mitigate their anxiety.
4) Easier Product Exchanges
Some users don’t want a refund of their purchase but rather want to exchange the item for a different product — for example, an apparel purchase that doesn’t fit right.
However, users who are forced to complete a return flow online can find it very difficult. As a user noted during testing, “I will hesitate to buy things online because I find returning very difficult. For Father’s Day, my daughter bought me a nice t-shirt from the Appalachian Mountain Club online. It’s too small. I don’t know what to do. I’m kinda stuck.”
Our Checkout and Mobile research has found that failing to present in-store pickup alongside other shipping options makes it much more difficult for users to find — which negates a crucial benefit of omni-channel sites (i.e., being able to pick up an item rather than having to pay for it and wait for it to be shipped).
Similarly, Self-Service testing revealed that failing to present in-store returns alongside return-by-mail options makes it difficult for users to notice the option, and consequently makes it less likely that they’ll take advantage of it.
This is a missed opportunity as not only do a clear subgroup of users prefer in-store returns (for the reasons described above), but users returning items to stores can also have benefits for the business.
For example, when users return products directly to stores, sites save on return postage costs (if providing free return shipping), are able to reintroduce the returned item to inventory faster, and there’s a possibility that users will stay in the store to shop further.
To ensure an in-store return option is easy to find, it should be presented as an equal option to returning by mail.
Often this means that, if there’s an online return interface, the in-store return option should be just as prominent as the return-by-mail option. This makes it clear to users that these are separate, but equally valid, options, and they can choose whichever is best for them.
Making the options visually equal in the interface ensures that users will be able to find the in-store return option when they’re actually thinking about returning the product.
Sites that don’t have an online return interface, but do allow in-store returns, should still provide in-store return information alongside return-by-mail instructions so that users understand their return options. Often this means including the information in the FAQs, help section, or on the product page. (Note: sites should consider having an online return interface, as it made the return process easier for users during testing.)
When users are returning products they are often already unhappy — their purchase didn’t work out, and now they must spend more time trying to get a refund. Along the way there are many potential pitfalls to the return experience, which we document in our Order Returns chapter in our Self-Service UX research study.
Therefore, to make the return process easier for some users, be sure to promote in-store returns equally alongside return-by-mail options. In particular,
This article presents the research findings from just 1 of the 640+ UX guidelines in Baymard Premium — get full access to learn how to create a “State of the Art” Accounts & Self-Service user experience.
Join 22,000+ readers and get Baymard’s research articles by RSS feed or
Topics include user experience, web design, and e-commerce
Articles are always delivered ad-free and in their full length
1-click unsubscribe at any time
I had clue that the bounce rate during checkout processes can occur due to many reasons, but have not actually that a user unable to find the right information related to the return and the convenience that comes with it can also lead to empty carts in the end.
I totally agree that providing a convenient option to return back the product as well as optimize the refund process by applying easy to access and visually easy to navigate refund and return option can ultimately reduce the bounce rate while increasing the customers trust value on the brand. Thanks for this amazing insight.
© 2021 Baymard Institute US: +1 (415) 315-9567 EU: +45 3696 9567 firstname.lastname@example.org